News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Two.js. Parent comment

Re:Two.js by stevejohnson on Thursday July 16, 2015 @05:18PM (#9899933)
People keep reimplementing the same thing to the same "80%" completion level so they look good to employers, but the software is abandoned quickly once it has served its purpose as a personal branding tool.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Two.js by santoriv on Thursday July 16, 2015 @10:07PM (#9900977)
Step 1: Someone invests a bunch of time making something new.

Step 2: Someone posts it on Hacker News.

Step 3: Project is immediately derided because other people have also been making new things.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Two.js by stevejohnson on Thursday July 16, 2015 @11:52PM (#9901206)
Just to clarify, I was explaining acgourley's position. This particular project is high quality.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Two.js by danneu on Thursday July 16, 2015 @08:35PM (#9900739)
If your trade is building things and you have nothing to show for it, then it's probably a good idea to have at least one thing you can point to.

But trying pin and dismiss the intention behind someone's open source project would be uncalled for, wouldn't it.

[ Parent | on HN ]