News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by fineman on Wednesday July 15, 2015 @07:56PM (#9894799)
How about ascii art?

Actually, this is an interesting topic. Poisoning a dataset. CP would work for private security investigators, and to poison against government investigators you could use leaked classified secrets.

Could you work around this by operating on the files on VPS you don't own, streaming a very low-res ('Basilisk'-proof - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLIT_(short_story) ) remote desktop image.

Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by curiousg on Wednesday July 15, 2015 @08:02PM (#9894829)
Possession laws are pretty strict and hard to decode. I wouldn't want to be the test case in court. The idea of "poisoning" a dataset is an interesting theoretical. But in practice, I just want to judge the likelihood that the dataset is poisoned by the presence of images. If it is then there's not much I can do with it.
Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by setuptools on Wednesday July 15, 2015 @08:06PM (#9894852)
Yes, this absolutely needs to be clarified by Gwern. This is a very dangerous thing to link researchers to if it contains any illegal content.
Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by fineman on Wednesday July 15, 2015 @08:19PM (#9894900)
Nonsense. Gwern doesn't need to do anything for anyone.

It's an interesting issue, and a way investigators may be attacked, but it's their responsibility alone. There exists data. This is that data. The data may bite. Touch the data at your own risk.

Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by amenghra on Wednesday July 15, 2015 @10:07PM (#9895160)
Guess what, laws aren't universal! Unless gwern has a complete understanding of your jurisdiction and can somehow guess how you plan to use the data, he cannot know what is legal and wasn't isn't. The burden lies on you.
Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by tomcam on Wednesday July 15, 2015 @09:57PM (#9895137)
Um.. It says Black Market right on the tin.
Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by mikeash on Wednesday July 15, 2015 @10:12PM (#9895173)
Indeed, a warning that it may contain illegal content would be about as sensible as the standard "Warning: may contain nuts" label on a tin of nuts.
Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by tedks on Thursday July 16, 2015 @11:24AM (#9897755)
What is illegal in a download of an online drug marketplace? Are pictures of drugs banned where you live?
Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by mikeash on Thursday July 16, 2015 @11:29AM (#9897793)
It's a general black market, not just drugs. For example, one of the sites described on that page is PEDOFUNDING, "A crowdfunding site for child pornography." Now the dump isn't supposed to contain any images, but it's hard to be 100% sure. In any case, whatever risk there might be seems to be clearly implied in the name and description there.
Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by tedks on Thursday July 16, 2015 @11:26PM (#9901147)
FreeeOW, that's what I get for skimming the list I guess.
Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by tomcam on Wednesday July 15, 2015 @09:55PM (#9895133)
Um... Dark market
Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by njloof on Thursday July 16, 2015 @07:18AM (#9896489)
Does ASCII art have victims? Other than its audience, I mean.
Re:1.5 TB of Dark Net Market scrapes by fineman on Thursday July 16, 2015 @06:22PM (#9900244)
Technically it could be translated from more traditional pictures. (Instead of being an original creation.)