Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by GrantSolar on Monday July 13, 2015 @04:01AM
(#9876916)
Chrome has google accounts to synchronise recently viewed pages across devices. This is just Mozilla's response. There is already a popular extension, so why re-invent the wheel?
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by sp332 on Monday July 13, 2015 @06:41AM
(#9877284)
Firefox already has sync built-in. I think this is supposed to be an improvement over the current bookmarks system. Mozilla realized that Pocket was already doing that better than they were, so they just integrated it instead of reinventing it poorly.
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by wtbob on Monday July 13, 2015 @09:48AM
(#9878022)
> I think this is supposed to be an improvement over the current bookmarks system.
The old secure Sync was great, absolutely great. I could see all of my bookmarks and history from all of my machines, and it was all well-secured. There was nothing wrong with it.
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by bzbarsky on Thursday July 16, 2015 @01:52AM
(#9895649)
The main thing wrong with it was that most people couldn't figure out how to use it and hence didn't use it.
This is a common problem with well-secured things (see encrypted email, signed email), unfortunately, which has proven very difficult to solve.
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by sp332 on Monday July 13, 2015 @09:51AM
(#9878038)
Doesn't it still work the same way?
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by lmm on Monday July 13, 2015 @06:11AM
(#9877203)
I see this as Mozilla basically admitting that the extension model has failed; this is a textbook example of an extension, but they've decided that's not good enough.
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by lagadu on Monday July 13, 2015 @07:05AM
(#9877343)
> There is already a popular extension
Exactly! There is already an extension, why isn't Pocket an extension then?
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by GrantSolar on Tuesday July 14, 2015 @03:45AM
(#9883358)
It is. I've been using it for years, they just decided to integrate it with the rest of the browser
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by lagadu on Tuesday July 14, 2015 @03:48AM
(#9883368)
That's my point. Why isn't it bundled with FF as an extension, instead of being integrated on the browser and effectively impossible to uninstall?
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by sp332 on Monday July 13, 2015 @09:09AM
(#9877844)
The Firefox team has been very aggressive about performance lately. Each extension you have installed increases the startup time, so that's probably why they baked it in.
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by 672723074828 on Monday July 13, 2015 @01:48PM
(#9879719)
So it improves the performance for a very small number of Firefox users at the expense of the performance of all of the other Firefox users who never would have had the extension installed in the first place?
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by sp332 on Tuesday July 14, 2015 @09:23AM
(#9884641)
If it is changed to an addon, it will still be installed by default. It will just be easier to remove. That means most users will take the performance hit because most people don't mess with the defaults.
Re:Firefox, you're supposed to be in my pocket, not the othe...
by orblivion on Tuesday July 14, 2015 @10:05AM
(#9884954)
What's wrong with Telefonica? I heard people complain about it when Hello came out and I never understood why because I'd never heard of it. Is Firefox still open source at this point?
Why force it on people who don't want it AND withhold the ability to permanently remove it? What's wrong with them?