News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dune, 50 years on by iwwr on Saturday July 04, 2015 @04:37AM (#9829649)
I would disagree. The sequels, especially 5-6 open up the wider universe and explore a variety of human cultures and social interaction. It's a fantasy-scify with deep and complex characters and complex interactions. Normally you'd start to see a scifi universe break apart after a few books, but Dune's could stand, it's 'realistic' in a sense.

If you mean the sequels, prequels, interquels made by Brian Herbert and Kevin J Anderson, then those are of a lower quality. They had the good fortune to inherit an IP and just ran with it. They may not be so bad as far as the genre goes (except for Sandworms), but they create a somewhat wider context. It's not for everyone, while I feel the originals of Frank Herbert may be, at least to people with a taste for sci-fi.

Re:Dune, 50 years on by nl on Saturday July 04, 2015 @07:51AM (#9829912)
The sequels aren't that well written.

The prequels shouldn't have been written.

Re:Dune, 50 years on by _jeans on Saturday July 04, 2015 @01:40PM (#9830875)
I would never consider the prequels to be canon, as they were not written by Frank Herbert himself.