Re:ARIN Activates IPv4 Unmet Requests Policy
by betaby on Wednesday July 01, 2015 @09:28PM
(#9816393)
Neither DNSSEC on Route53. Plenty of technologies are just not available on 'insert popular cloud provider of today'. That's why not everyone there where everyone-else.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ARIN Activates IPv4 Unmet Requests Policy
by scurvy on Thursday July 02, 2015 @12:51AM
(#9816904)
DNSSEC is a bad solution. That's why most have not deployed it yet. IPv6 is good. It works and works well.
Re:ARIN Activates IPv4 Unmet Requests Policy
by scurvy on Thursday July 02, 2015 @11:49AM
(#9819666)
Why the downvotes? Just because I said something negative about DNSSEC? DNSSEC is a bad solution. More well informed minds than HackerNews have come out as to why DNSSEC is a bad idea. I'm not being mean or spiteful. It really isn't going to work.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/03/18/is_the_dns_security_...
In light of the "Let's Encrypt All the Things" movement, I'm surprised that anyone could ever support DNSSEC.