News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Leaked: What's in TPP’s intellectual property chapter by vacri on Wednesday July 01, 2015 @06:23PM (#9815666)
> is U.S. companies doing all the expensive R&D

And they're certainly not struggling despite that; not sure why they need a treaty to 'protect' them.

> It's in our interest if people outside the U.S. have to pay us a bunch of money to get the drugs we invent.

Only if you think dollars are the only important thing. Plenty of people see welfare (including foreigners) as being a worthy thing in its own right.

Re:Leaked: What's in TPP’s intellectual property chapter by jonlucc on Wednesday July 01, 2015 @06:37PM (#9815723)
If you think Big Pharma isn't struggling, you haven't payed close enough attention. There is a bit of a crisis in innovation that is commonly blamed on the low-hanging fruit being gone. To cope, almost all of the big US companies have cut their discovery and preclinical teams significantly. In their place companies are paying contract companies to do large chunks of the more monotonous chunks of research or buying assets that are already developed to clinical candidate from academia or small biotechs.
Re:Leaked: What's in TPP’s intellectual property chapter by lugg on Wednesday July 01, 2015 @09:29PM (#9816398)
That sounds more like an industry with an unsustainable business model adapting and converting to a sustainable crowdsourced model.

"struggling" isn't the word I would use in this situation.

Things change, oil dries up. Doesn't mean we need to start making redflag laws to protect the old models.

Re:Leaked: What's in TPP’s intellectual property chapter by vacri on Wednesday July 01, 2015 @09:38PM (#9816418)
And yet they have enough money to get the influence to get the US government to strongarm other governments through treaties. That's not cheap.

I do hear what you say about the font drying up, but it's also no secret that medication is ridiculously expensive in the US. Big pharma is very wealthy, and very politically powerful, despite the low-hanging fruit being gone. The point I'm trying to make is that they don't need a treaty to protect them.