News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Thoughts on Time-series Databases by tsdbase on Tuesday June 30, 2015 @05:18PM (#9808495)
Can you be more specific? Is it car engine telemetry?
Re:Thoughts on Time-series Databases by engi_nerd on Tuesday June 30, 2015 @05:22PM (#9808522)
Aircraft telemetry.
Re:Thoughts on Time-series Databases by maaku on Tuesday June 30, 2015 @06:23PM (#9808794)
You really need to know the position of an aircraft to a thousandth of a second?
Re:Thoughts on Time-series Databases by engi_nerd on Tuesday June 30, 2015 @06:31PM (#9808834)
I said nothing about position. But a lot of things measured have to do with how the structure of the aircraft responds to turbulence, rough air, and aeroacoustic vibration (aka flutter). So there might be modes where structural components have harmonics that are pretty high (several hundred to over 1000 Hz). Therefore you must use a transducer that has a frequency response that can cover that range, and sample the output of the transducer at least twice that rate (at an absolute theoretical minimum, but rule of thumb is 5x oversampling).
Re:Thoughts on Time-series Databases by Serow225 on Tuesday June 30, 2015 @11:28PM (#9809914)
The highest sample rates I remember seeing was 20kHz, for the pressure sensors used in turbofan inlet distortion testing.
Re:Thoughts on Time-series Databases by engi_nerd on Wednesday July 01, 2015 @12:26AM (#9810066)
That isn't out of line with the ways I have seen that sort of thing measured.
Re:Thoughts on Time-series Databases by akavel on Tuesday June 30, 2015 @06:43PM (#9808883)
Possibly he might measure some other thing, but still after your question I started to wonder how much a passenger plane moves per thousandth of a second.

So: some quick googling suggests that "economical cruising speed" of an Airbus A320 is 840km/h [1]. After quick back-of-envelope calculations, this gives ~230m/s, so 0.2m per 0.001s. Given some possible uncertainty of a single measurement, I'd imagine that's not unreasonable level of precision when e.g. your Airbus is landing on an airport.

[1]: http://www.airliners.net/aircraft-data/stats.main?id=23

Re:Thoughts on Time-series Databases by engi_nerd on Tuesday June 30, 2015 @09:59PM (#9809622)
I guess I should mention that GPS position is a perfectly normal thing to include in a telemetry stream.
Re:Thoughts on Time-series Databases by bulte-rs on Wednesday July 01, 2015 @04:46AM (#9810663)
+ ins position of course; gps position is not reliable enough (less gbas) to land a big plane with.