Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules
by caskance on Friday June 26, 2015 @04:29PM
(#9787537)
That would require humans to have existed before religion, which is frankly quite ridiculous.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules
by Crito on Friday June 26, 2015 @05:46PM
(#9787949)
Are we supposing religious monkeys now? It wouldn't surprise me if earlier hominids were religious as well, but to call any other possibility "quite ridiculous" is really overstepping.
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules
by caskance on Sunday June 28, 2015 @01:28AM
(#9792524)
Not if you've ever met a human.
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules
by vacri on Friday June 26, 2015 @09:25PM
(#9788689)
You don't think that there were humans that existed before any form of codified spirituality? I'd be willing to believe that explicit ritual bonding (marriage) didn't predate religion, but find it hard to believe that the first words we uttered went along with some sort of priestly social class or referenceable rules for living.
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules
by gpvos on Saturday June 27, 2015 @05:42AM
(#9789633)
I don't know what the current state of research on this is, but I find it entirely plausible that rituals and social control existed before language.
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules
by vacri on Saturday June 27, 2015 @06:51AM
(#9789774)
Well, even creatures as low as termites and sardines exhibit mechanisms for social control - but it's not codified.
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules
by caskance on Sunday June 28, 2015 @01:28AM
(#9792521)
Why does it have to codified?
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules
by wj on Friday June 26, 2015 @04:41PM
(#9787613)
I do not follow?
Re:Same-Sex Marriage Is a Right, Supreme Court Rules
by caskance on Sunday June 28, 2015 @01:28AM
(#9792522)
It's not a very long sentence. What part is confusing?