News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sourcepoint: Former Googler Will Sell Tech to Punch Throu... by steckerbrett on Thursday June 18, 2015 @08:36PM (#9742423)
I've seen one person go thermonuclear trying to prevent ad blocking, and it seriously sucks. Randomly generated content classes and IDs, shifting DOM elements around to avoid them being targeted that way, and later on just completely removing all the divs from the area and manually painting large advertisements with primitives. Made scraping substantially more difficult, but of course not impossible.

One site that still has me beat dynamically loads all of the content and code through a websocket, and various bits are so heavily obfuscated that they look like brainfuck. Finding tools to tamper with SSL websockets is a challenge enough in its own right (Chrome has nicer tools now though).

Re:Sourcepoint: Former Googler Will Sell Tech to Punch Throu... by BobLaw on Thursday June 18, 2015 @08:47PM (#9742467)
Interesting. Link to that second site?
Re:Sourcepoint: Former Googler Will Sell Tech to Punch Throu... by pki on Thursday June 18, 2015 @08:42PM (#9742444)
For the first one, you mean noscript.net? View source on that to see how they try to push their horrid super registry cleaner pro crap.
Re:Sourcepoint: Former Googler Will Sell Tech to Punch Throu... by zem on Friday June 19, 2015 @02:48PM (#9746831)
are you doing it for the sheer fun of beating the ad-blocker-blocker, or do you need the information off the site?
Re:Sourcepoint: Former Googler Will Sell Tech to Punch Throu... by steckerbrett on Friday June 19, 2015 @05:43PM (#9747847)
One is screen scraping, one is attempting to find out how a product actually works. Neither goal has a monetary incentive so it is likely that people have got there before me.