"Overall, it would appear that benthic infaunal communities and sea grasses are the most sensitive to the acute effects of concentrate discharge; some communities seem to be tolerant of effects of up to 10 psu increases, while others are affected by increases of only 2-3 psu. However, few studies have evaluated discharges to embayments, where less dispersion of the discharge may occur, and the chronic impacts on demersal vertebrates, particularly those which have significant life history behaviors (i.e., reproduction, migration) driven by salinity variations."
There are also many concerns with the effluent than just salinity.
http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ocean/desalina...
The brine can be evaporated into salt as well, right?
It seems to mean that problems like this have to be solved via an entire system and not via individual components.
You can save a lot of energy by getting some water out of sea water, leaving extra-salty brine, rather than trying to get all the water out, leaving dry salt.
Desalination brine could be a big increase in efficiency for them in place of ordinary sea water.
[1] http://www.cargill.com/corporate-responsibility/environmenta...
In the next 20 years, solar will take care of that problem regardless.
If the infrastructure is available, it would be interesting to force things like watering lawns with only water from something like a desalination plant.
To supply 10 million households with drinking water from sea water, then, produces 200 million tons of salt. The current global salt market is 250 million tons, at a price of about $50 / ton. I find it unlikely that the market would bear dumping that much salt on it at a price that would make producing the salt worth it.
Disposal is probably a cheaper course.
Dumping 200 million tons of new "solar salt" on the market would collapse prices and signal the end for the existing player in the salt industry. I don't think this would be an issue in the long term as salt derived from a hypothetical mass-desalinization industry is essentially free. Replacing heavy industry with the byproduct of an essential and beneficial process is the very definition of economic and environmental efficiency.
California gets a secure water supply, consumers and industry get cheaper salt, and the imprint of the salt mining industry is no longer a concern in the environment.
*Source: http://www.saltinstitute.org/salt-101/production-industry/
http://www.wbez.org/series/curious-city/how-much-road-salt-e...
Obviously a little drive, but salt prices are high up here ;)
They relied on a moisture condenser built into the side of the rock initially (there is often very moist air caused by the cold air from the atlantic hitting the warm air from the med), but with expansion it wasn't enough and is now used primarily to provide irrigation to the nature reserve.
As TFA mentions, desalination is incredibly power-hungry. Additionally, it creates ultra-salty brine as a byproduct, which is difficult to dispose of -- if you just dump it into the ocean, you'll kill fish.
Finally, desalination plants are a great option for supplying water when nothing else is available, but as soon as you can get water from pretty much anywhere else, they become extremely cost-inefficient. Take the case of Santa Barbara as a great example: drought from 1986-1992, built a desal plant for $34 million. Turned it on in March 1992, it ran until June 1992, and then it started raining ... hasn't been used since.
(http://www.santabarbaraca.gov/gov/depts/pw/resources/system/...)