> Does that sound like something that's dying?
Yeah, it does. It's saying "we can't exist as just a shopping center any more, so we've got to become an all-in-one entertainment destination instead." Which, I'm sure will be successful, but not every city can support a $3.5 billion complex like that, and it doesn't bode well for the thousands of existing locations which are just plain shopping malls.
Not really. If it was dying it wouldn't get investments to extra structures and entertainment. Why put your new attractions to a dying complex?
It's only if it already does well that it can expand like that.
Yes, plenty of malls try the entertainment idea before failing, the issue is entertainment takes far longer than a store. So you end up far lower foot traffic levels which kills off the nitch stores that pay the most rent per squre foot. Without those high rent store the mall can't afford enough matence to keep the place pristeen which ends up driving away the big spenders starting the final death spiral.
In the end it's simple math, middle class incomes have been stagnate for more than a generation and people are doing far more online retail which means less leftover for malls.
I'm seeing the exact opposite.
> The transition to online shopping reduces the need for trips to the big box "anchor" stores
Most of the malls in this area have transitioned to entertainment destinations. Huge movie theaters, the stores are more showroom ... Tesla, Perch, Apple, etc., tons of restaurants.
They're building a new mall nearby. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Dream_Meadowlands
Apparently the cost is 3.5 billion? The new mall will have an ice rink, amusement park, water park, concert hall, movie theater, and an indoor 12-story ski slope for skiing, snowboarding and tubing.
Does that sound like something that's dying?