Re:“A Statement with My View on Curtis Yarvin and Strange Loop”
by tomjen3 on Sunday June 07, 2015 @12:38PM
(#9675318)
I know, I was trying to contrast letting him speak on neoreaction with letting him speak on orbit.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“A Statement with My View on Curtis Yarvin and Strange Loop”
by hga on Sunday June 07, 2015 @12:45PM
(#9675349)
Do you think there's now the slightest chance that urbit can win in the technology marketplace, or get any mind share?
I suppose others can copy its ideas without attribution, but if involvement in it potentially threatens your career....
Re:“A Statement with My View on Curtis Yarvin and Strange Loop”
by jpt4 on Sunday June 07, 2015 @12:59PM
(#9675409)
Urbit was initally released into the Public Domain, and still retains that spirit even though circumstance compels the project to now bear the MIT License - I suspect non-attributed copying would not be challenged.