News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell by XorNot on Tuesday June 02, 2015 @05:35PM (#9649190)
Isn't this just complaining you want a different tool? The entire Powershell format depends on, amongst other things, the object interface being sane, existing, and usable.

The whole point of the GNU system was working around the usual "I can see it here, need this bit, and want to put it there". If you need to do something really specific a lot, you write a tool which does that.

Re:Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell by vidarh on Wednesday June 03, 2015 @03:38AM (#9651109)
Exactly. The Unix/Linux world has not gone the way of a Powershell type shell for the simple reason that for the uses where we want an object-oriented API, we have a plethora of scripting languages designed for that purpose, and we all have our own favourites.

When we want a text oriented API we use shell scripts. When we want an object oriented API we pick our favourite scripting language - which may very well for many of us be different for different problem domains.

Re:Looking Forward: Support for Secure Shell by david-given on Wednesday June 03, 2015 @05:54AM (#9651537)
Yes, precisely. The main thing would be to do is to define the stream format, and then persuade people to actually use it.

The point of the exercise is that the traditional Unix pipelinable commands have standardised on unstructured textual data. Powershell has standardised on structured tabular data, which is what lets you do the cool things.