I knew something like this had to exist. Shouldn't this approach extend to modern hardware? E.g. surely there must be cases where it is effective to use custom FPGA-based hardware fit for the job, rather than (or in addition to) CPU and GPGPU?
I heard counter-arguments to the tune of 'hardly anyone wants to program their FPGA' which sounf strange to me: after all, hardly anyone wants to program their pixel shaders, either.
The real problem with FPGAs is that for 99% of use cases, CPU/GPGPU is good enough. And in the cases you really do need the extra speed, its rare you also need the flexibility, in which case you'd make an ASIC. There is a niche for FPGAs (especially in prototyping), but it's not as big of a market as you would imagine.
Re:Intel Buys Altera for $16.7B
by cmrdporcupine on Monday June 01, 2015 @11:43AM
(#9639498)
Awesome demo.
Also, dude has a Symbolics Space Cadet keyboard. Respect.
http://www.linusakesson.net/scene/parallelogram/
"For this demo, I made my own CPU, ... cache, ... blitter with pixel shader support, a VGA generator, and an FM synthesizer."
In his explanation for why he wrote his own CPU in the FPGA, Linus explained "...I was able to take advantage of the added flexibility. For instance, at one point the demo was slightly larger than 16 KB, but I could fix this by adding some new instructions and a new addressing mode in order to make the code compress better."