News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“We are only collecting the list of applications you have... by vdaniuk on Saturday May 30, 2015 @03:25AM (#9629389)
Sorry, I don't understand your reasoning.

Why do you trust your ISP more than Google? ISPs have much more shady practices and are able to match your online and real persona with 100% accuracy.

If you care about privacy, why do you use Android(non-cyanogen I assume)?

Re:“We are only collecting the list of applications you have... by simon_vetter on Saturday May 30, 2015 @04:01AM (#9629446)
Note that he could be living in a jurisdiction where the law provides better protection for electronic communications (email being one of them), thus preventing his ISP from reading/analyzing/reselling his emails.
Re:“We are only collecting the list of applications you have... by vdaniuk on Saturday May 30, 2015 @04:09AM (#9629455)
Which jurisdiction would you trust in this matter?
Re:“We are only collecting the list of applications you have... by e12e on Saturday May 30, 2015 @11:15AM (#9630417)
For all the problems we've manage to create, I'll trust Norwegian provider Telenor much more than I do Google. If only because they share my jurisdiction (Norway) -- where I have rights. I have no rights in the US -- at least when I'm not physically there.
Re:“We are only collecting the list of applications you have... by enraged_camel on Saturday May 30, 2015 @04:45AM (#9629507)
>>Why do you trust your ISP more than Google?

Presumably because the ISP doesn't generate the vast majority of its revenue from targeted ads based on information it collects from them.

Re:“We are only collecting the list of applications you have... by aw3c2 on Saturday May 30, 2015 @03:59AM (#9629441)
Theoretically the ISP is being paid for providing the service, while Google ... well...
Re:“We are only collecting the list of applications you have... by vdaniuk on Saturday May 30, 2015 @04:08AM (#9629453)
The implicit suggestion that one stops "being the product"[0] if one is paying for the service has no roots in reality.

[0] This oversimplification has to die.