Re:Uber Tries to Remotely Encrypt Corporate Data During Gove...
by placeybordeaux on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @09:39PM
(#9615601)
Is there any particular reason you chose pedophiles as the architypical information criminal?
Re:Uber Tries to Remotely Encrypt Corporate Data During Gove...
by jrockway on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @09:42PM
(#9615617)
Probably to outrage people and incite trolling.
Encryption may or may not protect you against law enforcement, but that's not the only use case: it also protects you from employees who forget their laptop at Starbucks, disgruntled system administrators, and so on. Law enforcement may be able to compel you to decrypt the systems, but laptop thieves cannot.
Re:Uber Tries to Remotely Encrypt Corporate Data During Gove...
by woah on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @09:40PM
(#9615603)
Only pedophiles encrypt data?
Re:Uber Tries to Remotely Encrypt Corporate Data During Gove...
by tzs on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @10:29PM
(#9615758)
Nothing he wrote implies that. He offered pedophiles as an example of a class that uses encryption to aid crime, not as an exhaustive list of all classes that use encryption.
If I wrote that in a recent program I used a functional approach, like they do in Lisp, would you think I'm claiming that Lisp is the only language with functional programming support? Because that's the kind of error you made in reading his statement.
edit: obviously i'm not against data encryption it's just funny how encryption is used in this case to obstruct justice, article in French, obviously but the headings are saying something like this :
(work in progress)