Why investors don’t fund dating

Re:Why investors don’t fund dating by hluska on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @04:37PM (#9607480)

ARPU is "average revenue per user", but I can't for the life of me figure out IAC. Maybe someone else can help???

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why investors don’t fund dating by Elepsis on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @04:56PM (#9607608)

IAC has basically stopped treating its name as an acronym and now just calls itself IAC, but it originally stood for InterActiveCorp.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why investors don’t fund dating by cldellow on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @04:39PM (#9607494)

IAC is a company who owns a lot of dating sites. Source: the article.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why investors don’t fund dating by hluska on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @10:42AM (#9611683)

Thanks so much! I have absolutely no idea how I missed that...:)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why investors don’t fund dating by smokinn on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @04:43PM (#9607527)

IAC Interactive which is the parent company of most large online US dating sites (among other online properties).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAC_%28company%29

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why investors don’t fund dating by KingMob on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @04:45PM (#9607545)

Pretty sure IAC is the massive holding company (iac.com) that owns multiple dating sites, and not a business acronym. Weirdly, a quick perusal of their site doesn't indicate what it stands for.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why investors don’t fund dating by nemild on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @04:40PM (#9607497)

IAC is a company: http://iac.com/

[ Parent | on HN ]