News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Web vs. native: let’s concede defeat by zhte415 on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @07:45AM (#9604077)
There's an answer to your questions. It is documented here: http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/
Re:Web vs. native: let’s concede defeat by xt on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @07:56AM (#9604136)
Re:Web vs. native: let’s concede defeat by discreditable on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @10:29AM (#9605083)
> A little less contrast. Black on white? How often do you see that kind of contrast in real life?

While grey on white may look better, actually reading text is easier as black on white.

Re:Web vs. native: let’s concede defeat by hiphopyo on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @08:06AM (#9604186)
Isn't that guy sorta missing the point of the first website?
Re:Web vs. native: let’s concede defeat by coldpie on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @08:38AM (#9604353)
> A little less contrast

> Size Matters

Strong disagree on both of these points. I view most webpages (including that one) at around 66% zoom these days, because the text is so goddamn big. And anyone advocating for less contrast needs a shovel to the head.

Re:Web vs. native: let’s concede defeat by lotsofmangos on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @08:57AM (#9604466)
anyone advocating for less contrast needs a shovel to the head.

Or they have the thing where high contrast makes the letters jiggle and therefore difficult to read. I get that when tired.

Maximum contrast does not make for good general usability, even if you happen to like it.

Re:Web vs. native: let’s concede defeat by charliefg on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @10:23AM (#9605033)
This is also my experience. As long as the contrast is within the acceptable WCAG ratios for accessibility, I don't really see any problem.
Re:Web vs. native: let’s concede defeat by accatyyc on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @12:51PM (#9605972)
That is beautiful. Perfectly expresses how I feel about the web today...