Re:A major milestone has been reached in our Brain Preservat...
by iLoch on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @06:49AM
(#9603881)
One step closer to me being able to spin up multiple instances of my brain to work on my side project and play video games with.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A major milestone has been reached in our Brain Preservat...
by ttty on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @10:09AM
(#9604930)
Please add a load balancer too. I hope we can have an interface like amazon ec2, but for brains
Re:A major milestone has been reached in our Brain Preservat...
by vidarh on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @10:38AM
(#9605148)
That would have been a somewhat less ridiculous explanation for The Matrix. "Oh, those vats full of humans? They're our neural network cloud".
Re:A major milestone has been reached in our Brain Preservat...
by jessaustin on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @11:38AM
(#9605494)
Yes, and considering that The Fall of Hyperion was published in 1990, that scenario should have been obvious to the Wachowskis.
Re:A major milestone has been reached in our Brain Preservat...
by eli_gottlieb on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @03:53PM
(#9607219)
It was actually what they intended, before the execs told them audiences wouldn't understand it.
Re:A major milestone has been reached in our Brain Preservat...
by vidarh on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @06:14PM
(#9614767)
Not surprising, considering I had relatively techie friends that were absolutely mindblown by concepts like pervasive virtual reality (never mind taking the next step beyond the Matrix to "uploading"). I was utterly taken aback at the realisation of just how foreign ideas like that were to people that weren't steeped in SF.
Re:A major milestone has been reached in our Brain Preservat...
by jessaustin on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @08:04PM
(#9608471)
"Humans are used as batteries."
"Humans are used as computer chips."
Neither statement really makes any sense without some creative thinking. Execs are weird.
Re:A major milestone has been reached in our Brain Preservat...
by toomuchtodo on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @02:57PM
(#9606866)
That postulates that everyone's brain is worth simulating.
In the beginning, only the most "valuable" neural mappings will be worth the computing time required to simulate them. And rights! Does a simulated neural network of a human being have the same rights as a human being? One couldn't argue that simply because the underlying processor is silicon-based instead of carbon-based rights are lost.
Many philosophical questions to answer.