That doesn't bode well for adblockers, then. DRM has been incredibly successful at
(a) acclimating consumers to the idea that they can't own digital goods[0], even the ones that they have purchased; and
(b) stifling innovation in the music industry for the last 15 years[1].
The status quo is that users have both the right and the ability to block ads. (The only missing piece is the knowledge or awareness of how to do so). In a DMCA-like situation, I can't see how things would realistically change for consumers for the better.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9414211
[1] Spotify doesn't count, since it's partially owned by the record labels. So the last major leap forward was.... iTunes? That was 2001.
Spotify doesn't count, since it's partially owned
by the record labels. So the last major leap forward
was.... iTunes? That was 2001.
Also in 2001, http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhapsody_(online_music_servic... :"Rhapsody was the first streaming on-demand music subscription service to offer unlimited access to a large library of digital music for a flat monthly fee..."
Native advertising is what's going to get us.
With the whole article.
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/article/243797/forbes-...
http://www.experiencetheblog.com/2014/08/new-york-times-nati...