News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Names Jony Ive Chief Design Officer by threeseed on Monday May 25, 2015 @08:13PM (#9602284)
I think you need to learn what literally means.

It isn't an iPhone on your wrist and when you actually use it has its own identity, behaviour patterns and user interface paradigms (tap, digital crown). Your argument is no different to the "iPad is just a bigger iPhone" which has been shown to be baseless by anyone who has ever owned one.

As for it being ugly I respectively disagree and given the popularity amongst fashion circles and in general I am guessing most others do too.

Re:Apple Names Jony Ive Chief Design Officer by danellis on Monday May 25, 2015 @08:21PM (#9602314)
> I think you need to learn what literally means.

From MW: in effect : virtually <will literally turn the world upside down to combat cruelty or injustice — Norman Cousins>

From Google: informal used for emphasis or to express strong feeling while not being literally true. "I have received literally thousands of letters"

From dictionary.com: in effect; in substance; very nearly; virtually: I literally died when she walked out on stage in that costume.

Re:Apple Names Jony Ive Chief Design Officer by kibibu on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @12:03AM (#9602880)
> informal used for emphasis or to express strong feeling while not being literally true

This type of definition is how you defeat evil AIs

Re:Apple Names Jony Ive Chief Design Officer by acheron on Monday May 25, 2015 @08:29PM (#9602331)
These people are making language objectively worse and should not be encouraged.
Re:Apple Names Jony Ive Chief Design Officer by danellis on Monday May 25, 2015 @10:32PM (#9602674)
Who are "these people"? People documenting a word's meaning that has been in use for over a hundred years? That's their job.
Re:Apple Names Jony Ive Chief Design Officer by threeseed on Monday May 25, 2015 @08:32PM (#9602339)
Being a bit disingenuous, no ? Literally has two definitions the first being the more correct as it is an extension of the word literal. The classical definition and the more recent definition (last few years).

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/literal...

As I articulated, in both definitions it is not like having an iPhone on your wrist.

Re:Apple Names Jony Ive Chief Design Officer by danellis on Monday May 25, 2015 @08:47PM (#9602379)
> Being a bit disingenuous, no ?

Not at all. If you pay attention to how people actually use the language, the word has both meanings, so either is correct. Such is the fluid nature of language. If you can't appreciate that, then I think you're very nice (in the original sense of the word).

Re:Apple Names Jony Ive Chief Design Officer by cwyers on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @12:27AM (#9602941)
Well, it would be nice if on the whole the fluid nature of our language added rather than subtracted. Allowing literally to add emphasis rather than being a statement of literalism makes it no easier to add emphasis but much harder to state something is literal in the classical sense. You are right that language changes and evolves, but that doesn't mean we have to passively sit by and watch it get worse.
Re:Apple Names Jony Ive Chief Design Officer by danellis on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @12:50AM (#9603004)
That it makes it worse is your opinion, though. If the prevailing opinion agreed with you, the additional meaning of the word would have been unsuccessful. Nobody is using it because they're forced to; they're using it because it feels right to them to do so.
Re:Apple Names Jony Ive Chief Design Officer by mcphage on Monday May 25, 2015 @09:54PM (#9602568)
I don't think I've ever heard 150+ years called "the last few years" before.
Re:Apple Names Jony Ive Chief Design Officer by mhb on Monday May 25, 2015 @10:27PM (#9602656)
Oh. So you read it on the internet.