News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What Comes After MVC by Shengbo on Monday May 25, 2015 @03:09PM (#9601264)
I think it would be nice to make that clear and allow people to make a choice. Otherwise most people will just use a spam address they never check.
Re:What Comes After MVC by Harkins on Monday May 25, 2015 @03:31PM (#9601352)
Yep. I've also seen a few people using the same strategy I do of [email protected] so they can recognize when email addresses get abused and trivially filter them.

For what it's worth, I have cleaned up enough servers hacked by spammers that I'll never send one. I guess I should mention that.

Re:What Comes After MVC by toxicFork on Tuesday May 26, 2015 @03:05AM (#9603319)
That works until someone writes a script that removes any \+[^@]+ from specific email domains :)
Re:What Comes After MVC by derefr on Wednesday May 27, 2015 @12:01PM (#9612285)
I've never seen that (or any other purposeful filtering of address tags.) On the other hand, I can't count the number of sites that were just programmed with an address validation regex that is unaware of the existence of address tags, and therefore thinks your email address with a plus in it is invalid.
Re:What Comes After MVC by chinathrow on Monday May 25, 2015 @03:25PM (#9601322)
You need an address to get the slides download link in his case.