Another thing that people often mix up, are security and safety. A secure door/building is a death trap. If people can't get in/out in an emergency, that's usually terrible, for almost any kind of building. A building that you can't break into or out of in less than a minute, is unsafe.
Or to put it another way: what's the difference between being in prison and living in a castle? ;-)
But yeah, stronger locks are pointless when you have doors that are designed to be kicked in [or out] in an emergency by someone who is able to apply a certain level of force to the right spot on the door.
Or care if you upgraded the lock and gave them a key?
So given the landlord would be fined by the city and told to change it back is the reason the landlord would care.
You could pick the lock or break a window, but that requires enough effort/behavior out of your norm to stop the impulse to maybe do something not-so-honest.
A) A pickable lock
B) A door that can be kicked in [fire code requirements]
C) Unsecured windows that can be broken to gain entry.
D) Crawl spaces that can be used to force entry from the outside.
You need alot more than a lock to secure a building.