Re:Silicon Valley’s 'Startup Castle' is looking for roommates
by slickwilli on Thursday May 14, 2015 @12:09AM
(#9543395)
I don't know how it works in Cali but in most other places if the landlord shares the property (like they themselves are also a tenant) they can be as discriminating as they want.
Re:Silicon Valley’s 'Startup Castle' is looking for roommates
by dragonwriter on Thursday May 14, 2015 @12:20PM
(#9545970)
> I don't know how it works in Cali but in most other places if the landlord shares the property (like they themselves are also a tenant) they can be as discriminating as they want.
That's not how it works in California (whether or not it is how it works in some other places); there are limited exceptions for taking on a single boarder and roommate situations, which are described in the page linked from the post you responded to, under the heading "Limited exceptions for single rooms and roommates".
Re:Silicon Valley’s 'Startup Castle' is looking for roommates
by mxhold on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @04:47PM
(#9541849)
John, a resident of the Startup Castle (who declined to give his last name), told me in an interview that he didn’t consider these rules discriminatory, and that the housemates were just “trying to get away from people who were obsessed with themselves.”
I'm astounded anyone could look at that list of requirements and say this with a straight face.
Re:Silicon Valley’s 'Startup Castle' is looking for roommates
by kelnos on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @06:29PM
(#9542404)
I actually thing he's serious. I truly believe he actually is that ignorant that he believes that the attributes in that list make sense with his "mission". Completely ridiculous, and really sad.
Re:Silicon Valley’s 'Startup Castle' is looking for roommates
by bradleynurse on Monday May 18, 2015 @12:26PM
(#9565293)
I know John, and yes, he is actually that serious, as is his on/off again gf Katie, who also is part of this startup process. As a previous tenant (from when they had a place in Mountain View), I can attest to some of the outlandish practices...interestingly enough, some of the rules, while applicable to others, they (aka Katie and John) don't even meet the requisites themselves that they necessitate.
Re:Silicon Valley’s 'Startup Castle' is looking for roommates
by waterlesscloud on Thursday May 14, 2015 @01:12PM
(#9546237)
At the same time, on a personal level I feel like people should be able to share their living space with whoever they want. I wouldn't like living with this group, and I'm certain they wouldn't like living with me, but I've got nothing against them deciding that's how they want to live.
It sounds like the 21st century silicon valley obsessive version of a commune, a long California tradition.
Re:Silicon Valley’s 'Startup Castle' is looking for roommates
by paulhauggis on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @06:05PM
(#9542274)
"language in the post, such as discouraging frequent make-up wearers and people with diagnosed mental health conditions from applying"
yes, they have lots of strict rules, but I don't see a problem with either of these.
It seems these days that everybody not only wants to be able to do anything they want, but no matter how outlandish, annoying, or potentially dangerous, it needs to be socially accepted.
Re:Silicon Valley’s 'Startup Castle' is looking for roommates
by lolhackernews on Thursday May 14, 2015 @12:15PM
(#9545945)
> It seems these days that everybody not only wants to be able to do anything they want, but no matter how outlandish, annoying, or potentially dangerous, it needs to be socially accepted.
Like being a woman or having treated mental illnesses. I now remember why I keep coming to this website, it's just hilarious.
Re:Silicon Valley’s 'Startup Castle' is looking for roommates
by tommorris on Thursday May 14, 2015 @01:01PM
(#9546176)
The language on the website sounds like its selling membership in a new religious movement ("Save the world", "Our purpose is bigger than ourselves", "Our spirit is cleansed by doing right by ourselves, our community, and our world").
Startup culture has finally spawned a monastic cult.
1. medical condition and/or physical or mental disability, (this also seems to violate federal fair housing laws)
2. source of income,
3. personal characteristics, such as a person's physical appearance [...] that are not related to the responsibilities of a tenant,
[0] http://www.dca.ca.gov/publications/landlordbook/discriminati...
That's not how it works in California (whether or not it is how it works in some other places); there are limited exceptions for taking on a single boarder and roommate situations, which are described in the page linked from the post you responded to, under the heading "Limited exceptions for single rooms and roommates".
I'm astounded anyone could look at that list of requirements and say this with a straight face.
It sounds like the 21st century silicon valley obsessive version of a commune, a long California tradition.
Best of luck to 'em, is what I say.
yes, they have lots of strict rules, but I don't see a problem with either of these.
It seems these days that everybody not only wants to be able to do anything they want, but no matter how outlandish, annoying, or potentially dangerous, it needs to be socially accepted.
Like being a woman or having treated mental illnesses. I now remember why I keep coming to this website, it's just hilarious.
Startup culture has finally spawned a monastic cult.
[1] http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/03/everyone-seems-mad-at-reser...