News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Verizon to Buy AOL for $4.4B by pyvpx on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @10:20AM (#9531919)
if so, then why should the pipes be privatized at all? in that case, the pipes should be built out and maintained at a governmental-level and leased back at a uniform/standardized price to all providers.
Re:Verizon to Buy AOL for $4.4B by jmngomes on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @10:38AM (#9532040)
It makes sense to me that the government should own "the pipes", and then lease them to competing firms, as these are a vital communication infrastructure.
Re:Verizon to Buy AOL for $4.4B by snowwrestler on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @01:59PM (#9533621)
That is called municipal broadband and quite a few municipalities are looking very hard at it.

http://www.businessinsider.com/chattanooga-tennessee-big-int...

Re:Verizon to Buy AOL for $4.4B by allendoerfer on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @10:49AM (#9532132)
Because, you want the pipes to grow.
Re:Verizon to Buy AOL for $4.4B by sliverstorm on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @11:24AM (#9532437)
I wonder if that really matters all that much. It could be my limited perspective talking, but fiber seems pretty future-proof. Nothing is faster than light; the only conceivable improvement would be cables that can handle wider spectrum of light.

(The nodes on the other hand, of course, are continually improving)

Ethernet cable is a similar story. NICs have advanced tremendously, but Cat5 (defined in 1991) is still usually all you need.

Re:Verizon to Buy AOL for $4.4B by nly on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @01:08PM (#9533191)
Fiber is future proof but most people don't have it. The process of getting it is called growth. If it's the case that making the "pipes" a public utility would have hindered growth, then you would never have got fiber.

And 100M ethernet over Cat5e is pretty useless. Standard WiFi these days is 150-300 Mbps. I regret not running Cat6 in to my extension just to be safe.

Re:Verizon to Buy AOL for $4.4B by sliverstorm on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @02:00PM (#9533631)
I would run Cat6a if I was building a house, because it's the latest spec and not much more expensive, but Cat5e is still great. Standard WiFi never gets anywhere close to those speeds, is simplex, and I find a 10Mbps Ethernet (powerline) link handily outperforms a 100Mbps WiFi connection for networked file system access. (Probably either an issue with the simplex or dropped packets)

P.S. Cat5e can still do 1Gbps, just not over quite as great a distance as Cat6. Although Cat5e definitely isn't rated for 10Gbps (nor is vanilla Cat6 for that matter)

Re:Verizon to Buy AOL for $4.4B by foldor on Tuesday May 12, 2015 @03:45PM (#9534365)
Cat5e does do gigabit speeds. You might be thinking of it's predecessor Cat5.
Re:Verizon to Buy AOL for $4.4B by tw04 on Wednesday May 13, 2015 @12:48PM (#9540214)
I 100% agree. In my ideal world, the government builds fiber to every house and pulls it back to a central POP where private entities compete to provide service over the top. Thus creating REAL competition and removing the barrier to entry. Unfortunately we've got a lot of people with their heads in the sand that think government is the root of all evil... so I'm working with what I've got :)