News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Without Systemd by vezzy-fnord on Friday May 08, 2015 @11:53PM (#9515429)
In all honesty, people who want a working Unix would have went to a BSD or Solaris variant a while ago.

GNU/Linux, although historically mostly abiding by Unix principles, has always had syncretic aspects as early as the desktop environments experimenting with various fat RPC protocols over 15 years ago, and likely other precedents earlier.

The introduction of the various storage abstraction layers like devfs and HAL, plus all the other monolithic subsystem daemons in the form of the *kits that emerged early on, foreshadowed what would come today, even if they were mostly manageable back then.

Re:Without Systemd by rpcope1 on Saturday May 09, 2015 @02:15AM (#9515700)
>The introduction of the various storage abstraction layers like devfs and HAL, plus all the other monolithic subsystem daemons in the form of the *kits that emerged early on, foreshadowed what would come today, even if they were mostly manageable back then.

This seems strangely backwards -- a lot of the "let's make this into files" philosophy like devfs, /proc, et. al. borrows from Plan 9, which is arguably more Unix than Unix; systemd on the other hand...