News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Bringing Asm.js to Chakra and Microsoft Edge. Parent comment

Re:Bringing Asm.js to Chakra and Microsoft Edge by TazeTSchnitzel on Thursday May 07, 2015 @03:31PM (#9507656)
> Sure, but under the hood both the HTML5 APIs and Pepper APIs call into the same code

It's still wasted effort, though. Maybe they share some code, but Pepper is an unnecessary extra API. One that's non-standard and results in vendor lock-in.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bringing Asm.js to Chakra and Microsoft Edge by dman on Thursday May 07, 2015 @04:21PM (#9507998)
Do you think Google could be persuaded to contribute PNaCL as an open standard?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bringing Asm.js to Chakra and Microsoft Edge by pcwalton on Thursday May 07, 2015 @04:34PM (#9508100)
There were beginnings of talks to get cross-vendor consensus on Pepper (which would be a prerequisite to any standardization attempt of PNaCl) in 2010: https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/plugin-futures/2010-April...

The general consensus among non-Google browser vendors was that just using the existing browser APIs was a more desirable approach than Pepper. Since then, Pepper has remained a Chrome-specific technology.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bringing Asm.js to Chakra and Microsoft Edge by cpeterso on Thursday May 07, 2015 @06:23PM (#9508766)
Could Google add NaCl support to Firefox with an add-on?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bringing Asm.js to Chakra and Microsoft Edge by TazeTSchnitzel on Thursday May 07, 2015 @06:26PM (#9508783)
They could, but why would they?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bringing Asm.js to Chakra and Microsoft Edge by dman on Friday May 08, 2015 @10:34AM (#9511902)
To help developers?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Bringing Asm.js to Chakra and Microsoft Edge by dragonwriter on Thursday May 07, 2015 @04:31PM (#9508075)
Judging from their FAQ [0] on it, it doesn't seem like they are generally opposed to the idea, just see it as premature at this time.

[0] https://developer.chrome.com/native-client/faq

[ Parent | on HN ]