News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tmux 2.0 released by olalonde on Thursday May 07, 2015 @12:13PM (#9506122)
Is SourceForge really open source? Guess I must have missed that news. Regardless, Gitlab would still be a better choice in terms of UX and is also open source.
Re:Tmux 2.0 released by e12e on Thursday May 07, 2015 @12:46PM (#9506405)
It has been released as Apache Allura, Wikipedia has a nice overview: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Allura

Install docs: https://forge-allura.apache.org/docs/getting_started/install...

I agree that sourceforge.net as a service might not be my favourite, but Allura the forge-software seems pretty good. I think the only thing that comes close is the stack from Canonical -- but Allura seems more viable to self-host (and scale up when needed -- rather than "only a vm" or "full cluster"). It also seems less "overly opinionated", and still includes sensible defaults (contrast with getting up and running with Trac).

YMMV, but it doesn't look half-bad. Right now I don't need anything more than what you can easily get with either a separate wiki+mercurial+mailing-list, "just" trac or fossil -- but for something in-between "too big to host internally" and "too complex for Trac to be easy" -- it looks rather interesting. I'd love to hear any war stories.

Re:Tmux 2.0 released by tobias2014 on Thursday May 07, 2015 @12:33PM (#9506305)
Re:Tmux 2.0 released by shmerl on Thursday May 07, 2015 @01:07PM (#9506591)
Do you know if Gitlab allows attachments in bugs and comments? It's one of the major deficiencies in Github.
Re:Tmux 2.0 released by DouweM on Thursday May 07, 2015 @01:19PM (#9506687)
GitLab developer here; it does! Where GitHub only allows images to be dragged into issue and comment description fields, GitLab allows this for any type of file.
Re:Tmux 2.0 released by shmerl on Thursday May 07, 2015 @02:04PM (#9507018)
Thanks! That's great. I'll use Gitlab going forward :)