Washington, D.C. http://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/Ballou+High+School (bottom right)
Chicago: http://www.cps.edu/Schools/Pages/school.aspx?SchoolID=610268
Baltimore: http://www.baltimorecityschools.org/cms/lib/MD01001351/Centr... (race statistics on page 1, test scores on page 3).
Philadelphia: https://webapps.philasd.org/school_profile/view/1200 (second item after "enrollment").
School choice means the prospect of black and hispanic families sending their kids to primarily white schools, and that is a non-starter in even the most liberal communities. San Francisco used to have a very progressive policy of assigning schools at random so that wealthy people couldn't congregate in one neighborhood and send their kids to the local school. Even that city had to dismantle that policy a couple of years ago.
I live in Oak Park, and my kids go to OPRF, which is 53/37 white/(latino|african-american). Minorities are (thankfully) overrepresented in the school. Oak Park (a/k/a/ "The People's Republic Of Oak Park") isn't conservative, and the (tiny) village is a haven for well-off white families who want to live close to the city without sending their kids to CPS schools. Lower-income families rent apartments along Austin Ave, or Section 8 houses on blocks like mine, and manage to get their kids into Oak Park schools without too much trouble.
It's awkward for me to see how the US restricts free choice between public schools. In this part of western Europe, except for queueing on enrollment and capped numbers, you just go to the school your parents decide to put enroll you at.
If understand correctly, the public school monopolies in the US are because mostly local taxation and much less higher level (state or federal) taxation funds local schools.
It might be interesting to see an experiment where kids from let's say East Palo Alto can go to schook in Palo Alto if their parents want so....