News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why do women have periods when most animals don't? by jacquesm on Monday April 27, 2015 @02:14PM (#9448125)
> To non-native speakers: apostrophes are for possession, not plural.

You could easily repeat that for plenty of native speakers. It's one of the most common mistakes in written English.

Re:Why do women have periods when most animals don't? by profinger on Monday April 27, 2015 @02:15PM (#9448140)
Isn't it sad? It's such a frustrating mistake.

There's a bar that we drive past frequently that does it with everything.

They're "Now accepting application's" and their "Burger's are $2"

Sad.

Re:Why do women have periods when most animals don't? by drostie on Monday April 27, 2015 @02:37PM (#9448277)
Since I moved to Missouri, I've been upset by a similar grammatical error: quotation marks used for emphasis. You would expect, say, all-capitals or an underline or italics, but you instead see 'Come taste the "best" burger in Missouri,' which is awful.

In New York, where I grew up, that use of quotation marks is called "scare quotes": quotation marks in all cases signal that you're detaching a text fragment from its context; with scare quotes you detach a phrase which reads just fine in that context to either bring focus to the phrase (like when you're defining it) or to indicate that the phrase itself is somehow problematic (like when you want to criticize the phrase, e.g. 'these "businessmen" are stealing our money,' where you're implying that they are either not truly men or not truly doing business per se.)

When you say that you have 'the "best" burger', to me it sounds like you're implicitly adding at the end, 'well, at least, it's the best at being an awful burger.'

Re:Why do women have periods when most animals don't? by panglott on Monday April 27, 2015 @03:24PM (#9448561)
This is a common practice in signs. It's wrong in literary English, but is it wrong in signs?

My pet theory is that quotes for emphasis were popularized in 20th century movie posters, where it was common to surround the movie title in quotations (this is still the accepted citation style in, say MLA style). This is probably wrong, of course.

Italics or bold for emphasis can be hard to hand-write, and the quotation marks for emphasis probably look more legible on chalk signs.

Re:Why do women have periods when most animals don't? by jarin on Monday April 27, 2015 @02:46PM (#9448346)
Re:Why do women have periods when most animals don't? by sciurus on Monday April 27, 2015 @02:47PM (#9448356)
You can see a collection of these at http://www.unnecessaryquotes.com/

The auther started the blog while at the University of Georgia, so the problem isn't confined to Missouri.

Re:Why do women have periods when most animals don't? by learnstats2 on Monday April 27, 2015 @03:52PM (#9448687)
Is it sad? Who cares? This minor mistake almost never makes a meaning unclear and at best it's used as a social indicator to classify people (perhaps in some contexts people are using it deliberately for this reason).

Apostrophe's represent plural's in one of the languages most closely related to English, i.e. this has changed in the recent past, and will change again.

Re:Why do women have periods when most animals don't? by CartyBoston on Monday April 27, 2015 @02:23PM (#9448186)
Wait ... where is there a $2 burger?
Re:Why do women have periods when most animals don't? by dhimes on Monday April 27, 2015 @02:23PM (#9448184)
> It's one of the most common mistakes in written English

Holy crap, really? I just figured it was because people were learning English on the internet. Also a peeve: "Loose" when the writer means "lose."

Not that I want to derail the board or anything...