News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple now rejecting apps with Pebble Smartwatch support by Alupis on Thursday April 23, 2015 @10:52AM (#9427104)
If Twitter was killing an App or Device made by a 3rd party simply because Twitter was entering that market and wished to monopolize the user-share, then yes I'd consider that anti-competitive.

(yes, Twitter does just that, and yes, it's anti-competitive in my book).

Simply not being able to mention "Android" or "Android Wear" or now "Pebble Watch" is ridiculous. If I chose to buy an Android Wear or Pebble Watch, it's because I felt it was a better match for me... I still would have bought an iPhone (since I'm looking for iPhone Apps).

Re:Apple now rejecting apps with Pebble Smartwatch support by mikeryan on Thursday April 23, 2015 @11:29AM (#9427365)
If Twitter was killing an App or Device made by a 3rd party simply because Twitter was entering that market and wished to monopolize the user-share, then yes I'd consider that anti-competitive.

This is exactly what they've done.

Re:Apple now rejecting apps with Pebble Smartwatch support by Alupis on Thursday April 23, 2015 @11:32AM (#9427392)
> This is exactly what they've done.

I realize that. If you look at the parent, they were making the argument that it's not the same.

Re:Apple now rejecting apps with Pebble Smartwatch support by mason240 on Thursday April 23, 2015 @11:35AM (#9427418)
>If Twitter was killing an App or Device made by a 3rd party simply because Twitter was entering that market and wished to monopolize the user-share, then yes I'd consider that anti-competitive.

Don't they have long history of doing exactly that?