News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Time Needed to Write “Effective Modern C++”. Parent comment

Re:The Time Needed to Write “Effective Modern C++” by tormeh on Thursday April 23, 2015 @06:47AM (#9425843)
C++ isn't evolving; it's just accumulating features. That's a crucial difference. The amount of harmful patterns you can accidentally use just keep on strictly increasing.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Time Needed to Write “Effective Modern C++” by mreiland on Thursday April 23, 2015 @10:59AM (#9427159)
take your unfounded bias elsewhere
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Time Needed to Write “Effective Modern C++” by tormeh on Thursday April 23, 2015 @12:19PM (#9427750)
It's called "observation", not "bias".
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Time Needed to Write “Effective Modern C++” by mreiland on Thursday April 23, 2015 @01:06PM (#9428167)
MY "observation" is that your "observation" cannot be trusted because you're being "unfair" in your "characterization" of C++'s new features as being the negative phrase "accumulating features" rather than "evolving" despite the idea that "evolving" implies getting "new features".

I also enjoy using "double quotes"

[ Parent | on HN ]