News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Project Fi by Google by mahouse on Wednesday April 22, 2015 @02:37PM (#9422566)
> Just say "Yes", Google. Just say fucking "Yes". It's not that fucking hard to say fucking "Yes".

Do you really need a "yes" there? I think it is pretty normal to have a stupid PR response there -- of course the answer is "yes". There is no other way.

Re:Project Fi by Google by Dylan16807 on Wednesday April 22, 2015 @03:10PM (#9422808)
Well the real question is "Does it increase radio power usage more than a couple percent?", not whether it literally takes a single joule.

Also the answer could be no! Transferring to a better connection can let you run the radio at lower power.

Re:Project Fi by Google by yellowapple on Wednesday April 22, 2015 @02:59PM (#9422727)
My point is that Google, of all companies, should be grown-up-enough to be able to resist the temptation to feed its users PR non-answers. Google's supposed to be bucking trends, "Do[ing] No Evil(TM)", etc.; they've set a higher standard and they're not meeting it.
Re:Project Fi by Google by ForHackernews on Wednesday April 22, 2015 @03:32PM (#9422960)
C'mon, "Do[ing] No Evil(TM)" is itself a PR non-answer to explain why we shouldn't be worried about their dangerous centralization of data and infrastructure.
Re:Project Fi by Google by RyJones on Wednesday April 22, 2015 @05:17PM (#9423624)
At Microsoft (and I'm sure at Google), there was an internal "rude FAQ" that was full of these answers. I felt it a shame we couldn't just publish that, instead.
Re:Project Fi by Google by bluedino on Wednesday April 22, 2015 @11:10PM (#9424818)
That Google is long gone.
Re:Project Fi by Google by ethanbond on Wednesday April 22, 2015 @02:43PM (#9422614)
Then why have it on the FAQ?
Re:Project Fi by Google by mahouse on Wednesday April 22, 2015 @02:46PM (#9422634)
Again, for PR reasons.