Google got it wrong. The open-office trend is destroying the workplace

Re:Google got it wrong. The open-office trend is destroying ... by jsprogrammer on Sunday April 19, 2015 @03:36PM (#9404493)

Busywork shouldn't be the goal. Busywork is what is given to children when the adults don't want to deal.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google got it wrong. The open-office trend is destroying ... by gnaritas on Sunday April 19, 2015 @04:02PM (#9404624)

You're projecting, no one said anything about busy-work. Busy does not mean doing unproductive work. Busy != busy-work.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google got it wrong. The open-office trend is destroying ... by Apocryphon on Sunday April 19, 2015 @04:15PM (#9404687)

But it's inevitable that any job will involve some amount of busy-work. Such is the nature of work.

Busy-work isn't unproductive work- at least, not to the organization. Busy-work is work that the organization needs to have done, but the individual does not find interesting or satisfying to do. Any company is going to require busy-work.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google got it wrong. The open-office trend is destroying ... by gnaritas on Sunday April 19, 2015 @05:06PM (#9404876)

> Busy-work isn't unproductive work

That's exactly what it is.

> Busy-work is work that the organization needs to have done, but the individual does not find interesting or satisfying to do.

That is not what the term means. Busy work: work that keeps a person busy but has little value in itself. What you're describing is simply boring work. If the work is useful, it is by definition not busy work.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google got it wrong. The open-office trend is destroying ... by jsprogrammer on Sunday April 19, 2015 @04:24PM (#9404728)

Projecting?

Not-busy != not-productive

[ Parent | on HN ]