Re:What Is the Public Value of Philosophy?
by ahallock on Sunday April 19, 2015 @01:11PM
(#9403882)
I would love to force people to pay for things I love to do. There's nothing wrong with teaching philosophy, but stealing money to do so is wrong and lazy. What if I'd rather my money go toward cancer research? This guy would deny me that opportunity. He's saying his preferences are more important than mine. There are plenty of ways to make money teaching philosophy: donations (see FDR on Youtube as an example), books, speaking at conferences--but that takes hard work and risk. And if you can't make a living, why not teach philosophy for free as an avocation? Contribute as if it's open source -- for the better of the community. Stealing money from people and justifying it after the fact seems unphilosophical.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What Is the Public Value of Philosophy?
by taylorscollon on Sunday April 19, 2015 @01:13PM
(#9403891)
You're arguing against taxes, not philosophy.
FTA
I am a professor of philosophy at a public university. What is the value of
philosophy to the taxpayers who subsidize my teaching
Taxpayers funding STEM subjects is very clearly an investment. But we fund philosophers only because have convinced us we ought to. But as Nietzsche said, that which convinces is not true, it is merely convincing.
Re:What Is the Public Value of Philosophy?
by littletimmy on Sunday April 19, 2015 @01:41PM
(#9403991)
Are you seriously making the argument that taxation is stealing?
He is saying that bad allocation of taxes is stealing.