News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A taxing algorithm by andy_ppp on Friday April 17, 2015 @06:50AM (#9393409)
Accountancy is largely (to paraphrase Keynes) moving rocks from one place to another. He was right Keynes, essentially for economies to continue growing indefinitely most jobs have to be bullshit jobs.
Re:A taxing algorithm by danuker on Friday April 17, 2015 @08:39AM (#9393880)
I only agree with the first sentence. The economy can grow significantly by discovering new things to do, and by discovering new ways to do old things.
Re:A taxing algorithm by transfire on Friday April 17, 2015 @08:32AM (#9393850)
And to think, we threw the tea in the harbor for a mere stamp tax.
Re:A taxing algorithm by protomyth on Friday April 17, 2015 @11:12AM (#9394797)
When the primary way politicians reward or punish groups is the tax system, you get foolish stuff like this.
Re:A taxing algorithm by marssaxman on Friday April 17, 2015 @04:52PM (#9397136)
The extra accounting work required in order to deal with taxes actually forms a significant deterrent to doing freelance work on the side. Every time someone asks if I'd be interested in a project, I have to stop and think: is this worth dealing with Form 1099 and Schedule C and keeping track of business expenses and all that bullshit? Generally the answer is no: a job big enough that I can charge enough to justify the extra hassle is generally too big to fit in the amount of free time I'm willing to divert from travel and hobby projects.

Of course doing just one contract project in a given year means I'm screwed come next April 15th, and knowing that drops the cost of entry for other projects; but I do wonder how much extra liquidity there might be in the market for programming services if the IRS didn't demand such a hefty commitment to paperwork.

Re:A taxing algorithm by phreeza on Friday April 17, 2015 @05:04AM (#9393050)
This is really more of a graphical representation of a formula. It contains conditionals of sorts (in the form of the min operator), but no recursion, iteration or other sort of control structure.
Re:A taxing algorithm by andrepd on Friday April 17, 2015 @05:41AM (#9393176)
"In mathematics and computer science, an algorithm [...] is a self-contained step-by-step set of operations to be performed." -Wikipedia

It's a detailed recipe to perform a task, so it's an algorithm.

Re:A taxing algorithm by murbard2 on Friday April 17, 2015 @12:17PM (#9395301)
Yes, it's an expression. The algorithm is evaluating that expression. However, algorithms also evaluate algorithms, and a better example would have been an actual algorithm that needs to be interpreted.
Re:A taxing algorithm by Houshalter on Friday April 17, 2015 @06:44AM (#9393388)
>What this meant was the wording of the instructions would be procedural rather than declarative. Instead of “Your tax is 15 percent of the amount on line 42,” we had “Multiply the amount on line 42 by 0.15 and write the result on line 43.”
Re:A taxing algorithm by ajanuary on Friday April 17, 2015 @12:26PM (#9395379)
I think the diagram must be slightly incorrect, else there are some odd bits.

* 20 is copied into 22 unchanged * 20 = min(min(14, 15), 14) - min(14, 15), which all simplifies to 0

Re:A taxing algorithm by xpan on Friday April 17, 2015 @12:51PM (#9395555)
Page not found