News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Android’s 10 Millisecond Problem explained by joenathan on Thursday April 16, 2015 @11:09PM (#9392064)
One would hope they were mature enough to understand an idiom, and not so delicate that they would need to be handled with kid gloves.
Re:Android’s 10 Millisecond Problem explained by Frondo on Friday April 17, 2015 @03:39AM (#9392730)
Really?

So if your dev team consisted of a mix of men and women (not even counting if anyone identified as neither or somewhere in between), you'd still say "Let's put in some manly-man programming time" to them?

What if your dev team consisted of just one employee, a woman? Would you still tell her to put in her manly-man programming time? I'm having trouble seeing it. "Jane, it's crunch time. Can you man up and put in some manly-man programming time this weekend?"

Re:Android’s 10 Millisecond Problem explained by joenathan on Friday April 17, 2015 @03:57AM (#9392788)
I already do this exactly, in the case where it's one woman it would be humorous to use that statement and would lighten the mood.

If someone is looking to be offended then they will find a reason no matter what is said or how it's said.

Intent is the thing that should be judged, anything else is a foolish way to live and you will constantly find yourself offended.

Re:Android’s 10 Millisecond Problem explained by Frondo on Friday April 17, 2015 @04:07AM (#9392828)
I'm sure the old people I know who still refer to black folks as "negros" don't mean anything by it. I also bet the people who throw around "gay" as a generic pejorative aren't thinking of actual gay people when they use the word as an insult. That doesn't make either one acceptable here in the 2010s.

Same with telling a woman that doing something "manly-man" style is doing it skillfully.

And even if you know it's going to be taken as humorous, let me give you a hint: it's not very funny. It's just not very good as humor. There is much better material out there if you're going for a joke.

Re:Android’s 10 Millisecond Problem explained by joenathan on Friday April 17, 2015 @04:29PM (#9397014)
I am black and would not be offended if someone referred to me as a negro, if they mean no offense, then I take no offense.

I've been referred to as African American, Afro American, colored, person of color, black, negro, etc. It makes no difference to me personally. Unless intended otherwise, it's just a point of reference.

Re:Android’s 10 Millisecond Problem explained by Frondo on Friday April 17, 2015 @06:21PM (#9397509)
Would you say that your personal experience is generalizable to many/most people of color?

If, say, someone from another company who's visited your offices for a day later refers to you as "that negro in product development," would it be typical that other people of color would take no offense at that use of language?

I'm curious about it. I don't have that lived-in experience, so all I can do to understand is ask and listen.

Re:Android’s 10 Millisecond Problem explained by joenathan on Friday April 17, 2015 @08:45PM (#9397933)
I have customers from Latin America and negro in Spanish simply means black.

Why would I ruin my day and relationship with someone by taking offense to a word when there was no malice intended?

Re:Android’s 10 Millisecond Problem explained by Frondo on Friday April 17, 2015 @09:08PM (#9397978)
That may be, but I would appreciate if you could also lend me your insight into the questions I had asked.
Re:Android’s 10 Millisecond Problem explained by Snesker on Friday April 17, 2015 @11:29PM (#9398215)
"not so delicate that they would need to be handled with kid gloves."

See... it's the little things like this. I am pretty sure that was not your intention, but please do know that turns of phrases like that hurt a little, and exclude a little.

To see what I mean, s/kid/jew/ or s/kid/white/ or some other category and see how it reads.