Ughs

* no linux version

* not open source

* announcement is very light on technical implementation

Unanswered questions

* Does it have any proprietory bittorrent protocol extensions?

* Will there be a possibility for open source community to produce alternative clients?

* Will there be firefox-like extensions?

* What about encryption/authorization/security/privacy?

It's frustrating to read about such an exciting concept with the most important details left out. I've searched around but wasn't able to find anything in depth.

Would appreciate a link or additional information from knowledgeable HN readers.

Shouldn't be too surprised about the lack of open source. They also didn't open source Bittorrent Sync which was another exciting application of bittorrent.

Absolutely not surprised. While being sympathetic to ethos of the general torrent community, I don't think that Bittorrent Inc. is one of the good guys. Too closed, too profit oriented, too corporate in their ways.

Bittorrent Inc. is both shady AND dilbert-like in its monetization shenanigans (bitcoin minerware for consumer PCs in 2015, really?). Such feat is not easily achieved. Sometimes I wonder if they are a trojan horse for the distributed content delivery community at large, making dumb moves on purpose to tarnish the torrent protocol brand. Hanlon's razor objection noted.

So I won't be using maelstorm due to trust issues but I would be really interested in alternative clients.

I refuse to use any software from bittorrent.com after what they did to utorrent.

Had a good time trying it out. While it's still in early stages, I can't wait for when it's adopted more widely. However, like vdaniuk, I wish there was more information given.

It won't install for me. I suspect it's being caught by av or anti-malware software on my machine but I'm not excited enough to troubleshoot it.

I would be more excited if it was open source.