Here is the scenario:
1. Google decides to buy my company in 2016.
2. They ask me to purge my codebase of React, so I switch to Angular.
3. Some years later, Google decides to sue Facebook over a blimp route optimization algorithm.
4. Facebook responds: "Well Google, one of your subsidiaries used React back in 2015 before you bought them, and now that you're suing us, that grant is no longer valid, so you're now liable for infringements on our React patents."
So with that scenario in mind, Google chooses to pass on buying my company, leaving some smaller acquirers, and maybe Facebook as possible buyers.
Please tell me this is not how it works. I would love to use React, but I can't bet the farm on this without more assurance.
Also apparently I now rank on Google for something; that is pretty cool.
Edit: of course, I also fat fingered that one - the l should have been an o.
It's called mutually assured destruction for a reason. Stockpiling patents as deterence is the most reasonable thing you can do in a system that allows software patents. It's the only thing likely to keep others from suing you over bullshit patents.