News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China's Great Cannon by xnull6guest on Friday April 10, 2015 @02:59PM (#9356410)
Yes. So greatfire, VOA, etc make a lot of sense - but what of Github? I don't believe they are a CSO on their face. I can imagine CSOs using github to host code or information that challenges the country (let's say software to organize demonstrations or circumvent surveillance) - I'm not aware of specifics.

With regard to CSOs and weaponized NGOs - I personally have a sour taste for them (I recognize that they are 'legal', however 'loophole-like').

This is because I am not willing to affirm foreign covert influence on United States/Western and my own opinion. So I usually hardly know whether to cheer or mope in cases where CSOs are challenged.

Re:China's Great Cannon by snogglethorpe on Friday April 10, 2015 @06:04PM (#9357363)
Huh? The reason for attacking github seems completely obvious, given that the attacked projects were (1) a mirror of the nytimes Chinese edition (explicitly intended to counter Chinese government censorship), and (2) anti-great-firewall-of-China tools...

[Not that they hoped to actually keep github down in the long run, but rather were probably trying to send a message that "hosting info the Chinese government doesn't like will make your life annoying so better not do it"...]

Re:China's Great Cannon by xnull6guest on Friday April 10, 2015 @06:19PM (#9357421)
Thank you - this is what I was asking for. :)

(Can you provide the links?)