News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Differences Between the Plane Crash in Tapei and the ... by parados on Thursday April 09, 2015 @10:55AM (#9347948)
> Can a computer land in the Hudson?

Well it did. One of the (probably lifesaving) actions that Sullenberger did was to deploy the RAT which meant electrical power was maintained. This was not a checklist item, merely something he though useful. This meant the computers were still firmly in control when the aircraft ditched and the stall protection they gave certainly helped the ditching.

Interestingly after the accident the NTSB and Airbus made a number of ditching simulations and it showed just how hard it was for pilots to achieve the correct entry mandated by the ditching certification (minimum speed, -1 degree approach). However one pilot, an Airbus test pilot, managed to do much better than this by levelling out at high speed and very low using the radar altimeter. He the allowed the speed to decay until the aircraft touched the 'water'. This unusual proceedure probably couldn't be done by many pilots but it could be done by a computer.

Re:The Differences Between the Plane Crash in Tapei and the ... by neurotech1 on Thursday April 09, 2015 @01:16PM (#9349181)
RAT is automatic. APU was started manually which allowed full electrical power and flight envelope protection.
Re:The Differences Between the Plane Crash in Tapei and the ... by foldr on Thursday April 09, 2015 @12:16PM (#9348643)
I think the RAT deploys automatically. The flight computers most likely run on a backup battery for a good while, but without the RAT there'd be no way to even move the control surfaces.
Re:The Differences Between the Plane Crash in Tapei and the ... by kjs3 on Thursday April 09, 2015 @07:25PM (#9351684)
That so much does not in any way describe "the computer landed the plane". At all.