Re:What Language Is Today's Python as Described by Paul Grah...
by CyberFonic on Tuesday April 07, 2015 @05:09AM
(#9332713)
I think it still would be Python. Can't think of any language that has leap-frogged the Python that Paul Graham described back 11 years ago.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What Language Is Today's Python as Described by Paul Grah...
by dottrap on Tuesday April 07, 2015 @05:39AM
(#9332793)
From how I interpret the linked article, it's not about language features, but the willingness of people to embrace/challenge better ideas that might not be mainstream.
And people don't learn Python because it will get them a job; they learn it because they genuinely like to program and aren't satisfied with the languages they already know.
I might suggest Haskell (re-emergent of pure functional, but statically typed) and Go (improved type system but without resorting to language lawyering and re-emergence of coroutines (besides Lua)).
Re:What Language Is Today's Python as Described by Paul Grah...
by spacemanmatt on Tuesday April 07, 2015 @08:43AM
(#9333521)
That pretty much covers why I elected to pick up Go and Clojure lately. I actually love programming, and my old tools were feeling rusty.
Re:What Language Is Today's Python as Described by Paul Grah...
by wodenokoto on Tuesday April 07, 2015 @05:45AM
(#9332811)
> And people don't learn Python because it will get them a
> job; they learn it because they genuinely like to program
> and aren't satisfied with the languages they already know.
Today people very much learn Python to get a job. It is listed as the top language for machine learning / data science (or at least top 5, depending on who you ask) and that is a very hot field job wise currently.