News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anonabox Analysis by joepie91_ on Monday April 06, 2015 @06:00PM (#9330943)
And arguing about the merits we should.

It is a tremendously bad idea to route all of your traffic through Tor. It completely breaks the Tor security/privacy model.

Negative bonus points for doing it as a WiFi AP - that's a great way to accidentally reconnect to a different AP when your connection to the Tor AP drops, and immediately tie your Tor traffic to your regular connection through automatic reconnects.

Re:Anonabox Analysis by yellowapple on Monday April 06, 2015 @06:14PM (#9331003)
This is likely the reason why the Anonabox generates random SSIDs; it forces the user to expect to have to connect to a new network regularly, and additionally reduces the amount of time available for an attacker to attempt to create a duplicate AP.

Of course, even this tactic isn't foolproof, and it's made rather ineffective by Anonabox's rather glaring flaws, but I can understand the rationale.

Re:Anonabox Analysis by joepie91_ on Monday April 06, 2015 @06:44PM (#9331132)
That idea doesn't work, though. Most devices/OSes remember your last access point, and will, upon a Anonabox failure / deauth / whatever, happily reconnect to your regular (non-Tor!) WiFi AP. That instantly compromises you. Changing the Anonabox SSID doesn't change that.