Re:The truth about the Bitcoin Foundation
by mahranch on Saturday April 04, 2015 @09:31AM
(#9320771)
> He received 19% of the popular vote
That's not a significant number. 19% might seem like a lot, but he didn't pick up a single state. If he had, then he might have been a serious contender. A serious contender is someone who "has a serious chance of winning". Ross Perot never had a chance of winning, and thus, was never a serious contender. He got closer than most to being a serious contender, but still didn't cross that line. He was projected to lose by double digits by literally every pollster and odds maker.
Afterwards, the democrats and republicans changed the debate rules to ensure they wouldn't be hit like that again, so they sure took it seriously.
Perhaps he meant to say Nader?