Re:Meteor 1.1 Released – Now Supporting Microsoft Windows an...
by akshatpradhan on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @09:06PM
(#9300943)
Why aren't these great books turned into the official documentation if the current official docs are lacking in so much quality?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meteor 1.1 Released – Now Supporting Microsoft Windows an...
by benstr on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @09:15PM
(#9300972)
The official docs are great for the core APIs. I agree more attention is needed for Blaze and Spacebars. But lacking? No.
The source code is very well annotated also.
Re:Meteor 1.1 Released – Now Supporting Microsoft Windows an...
by TylerE on Tuesday March 31, 2015 @10:44PM
(#9301214)
Because that sort of "consulting economy" is the open source business model de jure.
Re:Meteor 1.1 Released – Now Supporting Microsoft Windows an...
by petercooper on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @04:14AM
(#9302293)
It's not really new, except perhaps it being more indie now. In most (but not all) niches over the years, the paid, formal published for-profit books have provided the best documentation, right back to the 70s, through O'Reilly's catalogue (he got rich for a reason), through MSDN, and right up to now. Indeed, it's possibly better now because a single author can do it all on their own.
Re:Meteor 1.1 Released – Now Supporting Microsoft Windows an...
by Tenhundfeld on Wednesday April 01, 2015 @09:39AM
(#9303399)
Just FYI: du jour. De jure means something else.