Re:Why TCP Over TCP Is a Bad Idea (2001)
by IgorPartola on Sunday March 29, 2015 @12:41AM
(#9283901)
TCP over UDP.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
So sitting at starbucks with my laptop -- what do i do? I am not aware of an option to have SSH run over UDP, although I do know that some VPNs allow you to use UDP instead of TCP.
Unless there is a relatively simple way of getting an encrypted tunnel for my HTTP traffic using tools like ssh and netcat and other things I'm likely to already have installed, I disagree with the notion that it's never a good idea.
Re:Why TCP Over TCP Is a Bad Idea (2001)
by IgorPartola on Sunday March 29, 2015 @05:31PM
(#9286560)
When you are running a SOCKS proxy through ssh, you are not doing TCP over TCP. We are talking about things like OpenVPN which can do TCP over TCP, but that is generally a bad idea. It's default mode is TCP over UDP, as it should be.
> When you are running a SOCKS proxy through ssh, you are not doing TCP over TCP
Are you sure? SSH uses TCP, and encapsulates the web traffic which also uses TCP... in what way is that not TCP over TCP?
Here, read this: https://github.com/apenwarr/sshuttle#theory-of-operation
"TCP-over-TCP" and "TCP carried on something that happen to be TCP" turn out to be two very different things.