Re:Monsanto Weedkiller Is ‘Probably Carcinogenic,’ WHO Says
by mkempe on Saturday March 28, 2015 @12:14PM
(#9281873)
There is evidence for and debate surrouding hormesis, a positive biological response to a little bit of something deadly at higher doses e.g. low-dose radiation. [1] [2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hormesis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_hormesis
Re:Monsanto Weedkiller Is ‘Probably Carcinogenic,’ WHO Says
by eurleif on Saturday March 28, 2015 @12:03PM
(#9281831)
>With UV, that mechanism is the production of vitamin D in the body, a lack of which causes a wide variety of health issues and may have a link to the development of cancer.
I imagine that vitamin D production and DNA damage are separate events. Presumably, both can occur at the same time.
So would someone who took vitamin D supplements but didn't get sun exposure be slightly less likely to develop cancer than someone who got just enough sunlight for their body to produce enough vitamin D?
If that's the case, it's not really a general rule that small exposures to carcinogens prevent cancer.
Re:Monsanto Weedkiller Is ‘Probably Carcinogenic,’ WHO Says
by jp555 on Sunday March 29, 2015 @09:01AM
(#9284667)
I've just recently seen work that's exploring vitamin D suplimation vs. sunlight derived vitamin D and they're finding the sunlight provides more benefit than no sunlight exposure and Vitamin D suplimation.
This panel by the Mars Society actually had a very interesting discussion of this area of human health that deserves much more study. https://youtu.be/sFHQlobJbwY