News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Shut-In Economy by WalterSear on Thursday March 26, 2015 @09:19AM (#9269291)
For me, that's barely cheaper than eating out, if at all. The portions are always big enough for two people - unhealthily so.
Re:The Shut-In Economy by JohnBooty on Thursday March 26, 2015 @11:40AM (#9270397)
For us, sit-down meals for two at a restaurant were usually at least $50 including tip.

I'm comparing Blue Apron specifically to a sit-down meal because for us the point of dining out was to relax and spend time together - something that cooking at least three meals a week together gets us to do. It also gets us to try ingredients we wouldn't normally consider.

That's just why it works for us, specifically! Definitely not for everybody. I don't work for them and the only stock I own is chicken stock. :)

Re:The Shut-In Economy by smackfu on Thursday March 26, 2015 @12:06PM (#9270644)
They always keep right around 700 calories, which is pretty healthy for a dinner.
Re:The Shut-In Economy by WalterSear on Thursday March 26, 2015 @07:59PM (#9273962)
That's not the point. It means they are delivering the same amount of food (2 X half a portion), for pretty much the same price, minus the enjoyment of eating out. And apparently, they take about as much to make as a regular meal from the store.

EDIT: I think we are talking at cross purposes - I meant restaurant meals are usually plenty for two people.

Re:The Shut-In Economy by smackfu on Friday March 27, 2015 @09:48AM (#9276202)
Ah yes, I thought you were referring to the home meals as having two servings.