Hacker's guide to Neural Networks

Re:Hacker's guide to Neural Networks by NhanH on Monday March 23, 2015 @06:33AM (#9250191)

As much as I want it to be true, among Lisp, Erlang, Prolog, Ocaml/Haskell and Smalltalk (those are non-mainstream and definitely not bonker language) it's almost impossible for an average CS grad to be able to read them all.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hacker's guide to Neural Networks by Swizec on Monday March 23, 2015 @06:45AM (#9250226)

Is it?

Sure, you might not understand all the intricacies of each, but I think the basic idea should be understandable when expressed in any of those languages. But I'm biased, I was exposed to Prolog in college and I learned Lisp and Haskell on my own (to an extent) so it's really difficult for me to judge what is and isn't readable.

But if you can read: foo.map(function (d) { return d+1; }), you should be able to read (map foo (+1)) imho.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hacker's guide to Neural Networks by eli_gottlieb on Monday March 23, 2015 @10:42AM (#9251169)

Among all of those, I've never used Prolog, and only had one summer project's experience in Erlang, and a tiny bit of coursework in Smalltalk. But I'm pretty sure that other than Prolog, I can figure out what's going in a program in any of those languages.

Mind, at the time I graduated undergrad, I had no real idea about Smalltalk. But that was 4 years ago.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hacker's guide to Neural Networks by collyw on Monday March 23, 2015 @06:45AM (#9250228)

12 years experience here. I think I could have a geuess at what Lisp code is doing, likewise with OCmal / Haskell. I have never written anything in any of them, but have read a couple for tutorials.

Never seem Erlang, Prolog or Smalltalk code.

I am capable of deciphering Perl code as long as its not too obfuscated.

[ Parent | on HN ]