News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nes emulator written in go by dtech on Monday March 23, 2015 @04:06AM (#9249896)
Another ${things that exists} in ${current trendy programming language} submission, why does this get upvoted?
Re:Nes emulator written in go by ncza on Monday March 23, 2015 @04:23AM (#9249923)
Because programming is fun, new languages too and hacking is what this site is about.
Re:Nes emulator written in go by dagw on Monday March 23, 2015 @06:55AM (#9250256)
Because comparing the same thing done the 'new' way and the 'old' way is one of the best ways to see the differences between the two ways and find out if and when the new way is better.
Re:Nes emulator written in go by 0xdeadbeefbabe on Monday March 23, 2015 @12:22PM (#9251689)
I take it as a sign of intelligent life in an otherwise web dominated world.
Re:Nes emulator written in go by le_lenny_face on Monday March 23, 2015 @06:50AM (#9250242)
Because this is Hacker News.

Because doing ${things that exists} in ${current trendy programming language} is somehow gauged as a Good Thing™ in your portfolio by the startup mindset.

Because posting this Good Thing™ on Hacker News is basically the SF startup scene's own LinkedIn equivalent.

Because other people who has bee doing this Good Thing™ want their own Good Things™ to be validated as well, so they continue this tradition.

Re:Nes emulator written in go by alenmilk on Monday March 23, 2015 @07:39AM (#9250365)
Because Conservatives are always on the wrong side of history. And new things replace the old, and there is a reason C is the biggest language of them all.
Re:Nes emulator written in go by JustSomeNobody on Monday March 23, 2015 @09:00AM (#9250598)
I don't have a problem with people scratching an itch. This is how we practice our craft. However, how is writing yet another NES emulator anything but conservative given the vast number of example and documentation to draw from? Sure, it's not as simple as writing yet another TODO list in yet another JavaScript framework, but it's not 'new'.